by Lane Keller  

This post is not a comprehensive study. It is meant to give a fact-based overview from a viewpoint that has been banned, ridiculed and essentially omitted from public view. We are no longer a country of free speech: those seeking truthful answers in this, and other, debates have been silenced. Those who are unaware that pharmaceutical lobbies run the politicians and also the media in this country, and that social media has shut down alternative viewpoints related to vaccines, and that a full-scale assault on holism is being waged by entities like Google (which possess vested financial interest in pharmaceutical-related entities), should take stock of the actions against the First Amendment in this country before it is too late. 

Add to this that the proponents of vaccines have billions of dollars at their disposal, while those pushing for truth and transparency – those “dangerous,” “crazy” “anti-vaxers” – find themselves financially disadvantaged having lost their jobs, reputations and even their lives when they persist in their research.

I can vouch first hand that NO-ONE pays for vaccine transparency articles or anything that contradicts the mainstream narrative, making for a real Samson and Goliath situation.

On to the question:

Are doctors a trustworthy source of info on vaccines? In other words, are they free from bias, with your’s or your child’s best interests at heart?


let’s start with the issue of vaccine safety, or the proven fact that no studies have been done demonstrating the SAFETY of vaccines or EFFICACY of vaccines or of CONCOMITANT (concurrent) vaccines usage.

Don’t believe me?

In 2018, it was established by ICAN (Informed Consent Action Network) that governmental agencies, along with vaccine manufacturers, have not complied with the congressional mandate established in1986, which provided immunity from lawsuits, and eliminated liability for the drug companies AS LONG AS THEY SHOWED PROOF THAT VACCINES WERE SAFE AND EFFECTIVE. AND MORE SAFE AND EFFECTIVE THAN THE VACCINES ON THE MARKET PRIOR TO THEIR INTRODUCTION.

In this bill, vaccine manufacturers were congressionally mandated to provide research EVERY TWO YEARS to the CDC and HHS, demonstrating the increasing safety and efficacy of the vaccines they were introducing.


Here is the court document proving it:

No research, or any of the stipulated requirements, has been undertaken.

WHY? you might ask. How could this be??

This means all the alleged “anti-vaxers” who are in reality transparency activists, such as parents of vaccine-injured children, are correct??

FACT: No studies have been done to date, or provided to, or by, any  government agencies, proving vaccines are safe and effective, or that their ever-increasing number is justified.

This is NOT a conspiracy theory. Transparency advocates are NOT crying wolf when they ask, “where is the science“? 

More on that to come. 

For nowyou should know that ALL of the 72 vaccines mandated for children are produced by four companies: Merck, Sanofi, Pfizer, and Glaxo-Smith Kline. 

There have been multiple whistleblower testimonies and court cases proving that these companies obfuscate, omit or misrepresent the truth in order to get their products onto the market. They are repeatedly proven to have delivered known, dangerous products to the public, with minor financial redress, while being allowed to continue these practices.

Here is just a sampling:

Despite the leaks and court cases, press coverage is little to none, and the stories are mostly buried by the big search engines and falsely discredited by social media and ‘shill’ companies such as Snopes, which was set up precisely for the purpose of making people disbelieve truthful information.

In addition to making $60-billion per year selling vaccines, pharmaceutical companies make an additional $500-billion selling medications for diseases the vaccines cause.

But it isn’t proven vaccines cause autism, neurological impairment or any other disease” you might say. This will be addressed in a future post. In the meantime, take a look at this informative, fact-based and substantive article:

For now, let’s examine the sources your pediatrician or GP listen to. Take the CDC for instance, which functions as a vaccine company with a budget of $11- billion per year. $5-billion is spent on buying vaccines at inflated prices. The CDC approves vaccines, buys them from their manufacturer associates, and then tells 78-million people to use them even though they have never been tested for safety. To date, the CDC holds patents to multiple (hundreds!) of vaccine related products, profiting from each one.

Below, are just a very few of the hundreds of patents owned by the CDC AND FROM WHICH THEY DERIVE PROFIT.


Here is a groundbreaking article published by the highly-regarded medical periodical, BMJ (British Medicine Journal), in which the journalist exposes the CDC for being a profit-making entity with a demonstrated conflict of interest.

It’s not just the CDC that can’t be trusted, but the other agencies as well.

At risk of being labelled ‘conspiracy theory’ (a term invented in the 50’s to discredit whistleblowers), there is this memo by (WHO) the World Health Organization which explains how to use vaccines as bio-weapons:

Putting aside the WHO memo for now, how about the dozens of suppressed (and murdered), whistleblowers who have researched or shared the link between autism and vaccines, and who discovered nefarious ingredients in vaccines such as ‘nagalase’, a known cancer-causing ingredient that suppresses GcMAF?

“GcMAF (Globulin component Macrophage Activating Factor) is not a drug, but a naturally occurring compound produced in the human body. GcMAF was being produced in Europe and Dr. Bradstreet was using it with his patients. He was conducting clinical experiments the results of which were published in scientific medical journals (The European company that manufactured GcMAF was shut down in July 2015).

The ability of GcMAF to do its normal job can be inhibited by the presence of a protein called alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase or Nagalase for short. Nagalase is made by all cancer cells and viruses (HIV, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, influenza, herpes, Epstein-Barr virus, and others). Nagalase blocks the production of GcMAF, thus preventing the immune system from doing its job. By using injections of GcMAF, one can boost the immune system to destroy the cancer and virus. It’s the most natural cure in the world and other countries are already using it, even for pets.

In the course of his research, Dr. Bradstreet discovered that the levels of Nagalase are elevated in children with autism. The result of the immune suppression caused by Nagalase is seen in digestive disorders, sensory overload, and numerous types of processing dysfunction in the brain. Increased levels of Nagalase are associated with higher levels of autistic symptoms. Nagalase is like Attila the Hun in the amount of destruction it can wreak on the body.

Nagalase is not something children are born with. This puzzled Bradstreet and his colleagues (the other doctors who are now dead). If autistic children don’t have cancer or viral infections, which correlates with Nagalase production, then how did it get into the bodies of infants and young children?”

So revising the initial question:

Can it be that medical doctors are unbiased and informed enough to offer a sound, well-founded and unbiased opinion when it comes to using vaccines on your child?

A Speak Project associate was recently at the yearly CDC conference in Atlanta, attended by doctor and hospital administrators across the country. Who was on the panel do you suppose? A well-rounded panel of experts giving unbiased opinions, or representatives of profit-making entities like Merck? You guessed correctly. You can find the agenda of speakers, below.

From A. Rowe V. U.S.A. INC. AFFIRMATION OF LIFE, LIBERTY & THE PURSUIT OF TRUTH  by Steffen Rowe and Michaele Walker:

“The Schedule for the 2019 ACIP meeting held in Atlanta shows a clearly biased roster that includes vaccine manufacturer representatives as the only invited speakers and includes Alex Perkins, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, whose lab is funded by the Global Alliance for Vaccine Impact (GAVI), and the Bill and Melinda Gate Foundation. 

 GAVI states it is in partnership with UNICEF (The United Nations Children’s Fund), WHO (World Health Organization), The World Bank, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the vaccine manufacturing industry, public health institutions and NGO’s (non-governmental organizations).  

The CDC has a very clear financial interest in the vaccines yet also acts as the regulatory authority to oversee quality control, safety, and efficacy of the vaccines. They are also responsible for notifying the public of outbreaks starting with as few as four cases of a disease. In addition, the included exhibit demonstrates that the government also makes money from the Federal Excise tax paid with every dose.  

These obvious issues make it impossible for the CDC or any government entity to act as the regulatory authority over the vaccines because they profit from every dosage administered.”

Now, back to those ‘unbiased’ pediatricians and family doctors.

Anyone who has experience in the holistic field knows one thing for certain: a strong immune system is the absolute best defense against illness in existence. And it’s largely free! Vaccines in fact destroy the immune system, but saving that for another article, let’s just state that to date there has been little to no money put forward for testing natural products that combat disease, or which create a disease-proof immune system. This is precisely because the techniques and products used are natural, can not be patented, and no real money can be made from them.

One thing doctors will say to you is  that very few if any vaccine-related injuries are reported. A whole book could be written on this issue alone, but suffice to say that according to the CDC’s OWN STUDY, less than 10% of reactions are reported. The study is below. This ten percent of reported adverse effects is estimated by the study to represent in reality only 1% of adverse events, as many parents don’t make the connection, are talked out of the relationship between the reaction and the vaccines by their doctors, or don’t have the funds to fight their claims in court as so many are forced to do.

The Vaccine Injury Compensation System is based on the honor system, relying on untrained parents to report adverse reactions due to the vaccination of their child and follow the appropriate due process to petition their claim with the V.I.C.S. system. Most medical professionals, media, and the regulatory authorities report that vaccines are safe and effective, leaving little reason for parents to inquire about an injury from a vaccine.

Parents can report adverse reactions to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in the event that they witness an abnormal reaction or behavior in their child that they attribute to a recent vaccine administered to them.

However, according to the CDC and the FDA none of the vaccines have been studied to examine the effects of concomitant vaccine usage. Therefore it would be impossible for parents to ever be properly informed about the potential signs to look for in the case of an adverse event because there are no studies that have been done to draw conclusions from in order to justify the efficacy of vaccines, or to nullify their usage due to other reasons. 


In this study, the researchers reported that the system was only capturing approximately 1% of the actual adverse events being caused by vaccines.

Based on this research using the VAERS system, vaccines could be responsible for approximately 672,408 major injuries including death and autism.

This information was shared with Human Health Services as this project was funded by a Federal grant under the umbrella of ‘The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’ (AHRQ), at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 



Regardless of whether the figures represent 10% or 1%, at the end of this article are just a FEW of the thousands of adverse reactions reported to VAERS.

Going back to the autism link for a second, there is another question that needs to be posed:


So back to our question, revised again, with apologies for the deviations:


If you consider that medical schools offer NO holistic viewpoint and pharma-based tutelage only, without looking at the 5000+ year-old schools of medicine taught in China and India for instance, or the schools of herbology, or that of true immunology: homeopathy, or the burgeoning fields of energetic, vibrational, & quantum medicines,

How can this be considered well-rounded and informed?

Would you consider financial incentives to be a motive for bias, or at least a conflict of interest?

From the Alliance for Natural Health:

“…Blue Cross Blue Shield pays pediatricians $400 per fully vaccinated child. If your pediatrician has just 100 fully-vaccinated patients turning 2 this year, that’s $40,000. Yes, Blue Cross Blue Shield pays your doctor a $40,000 bonus for fully vaccinating 100 patients under the age of 2. If your doctor manages to fully vaccinate 200 patients, that bonus jumps to $80,000. 

“But here’s the catch: Under Blue Cross Blue Shield’s rules, pediatricians lose the whole bonus unless at least 63% of patients are fully vaccinated, and that includes the flu vaccine. So it’s not just $400 on your child’s head–it could be the whole bonus. To your doctor, your decision to vaccinate your child might be worth $40,000, or much more, depending on the size of his or her practice.

If your pediatrician recommends that your child under the age of two receive the flu vaccine—even though the flu vaccine has never been studied in very young children and evidence suggests that the flu vaccine actually weakens a person’s immune system over the long term[2]–ask yourself:  Is my doctor more concerned with selling me vaccines to keep my child healthy or to send his child to private school?” 

Hard to believe, isn’t it? But the Blue Cross/Blue Shield/Blue Care of Michigan “2016 Performance Incentive Booklet looks real…download it from and read what it says yourself. If this web-address is “not available” or “no longer available” (found it today when this was written) that alone tells you something, doesn’t it?”

In other words, a typical doctor can supplement his yearly income by $80,000 or more PER YEAR, by fully vaccinating 200 patients.

What is the incentive for NOT vaccinating? $0.

I would call these significant facts. As we like to say: “follow the money,” and draw your own conclusions from there.

© 2020, Lane Keller. All rights reserved.

%d bloggers like this: