Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP90-00965R000100260020-4.pdf
CIA-RDP90-The-Invisible-Third-World-WarClare’s Reflections April 7, 2020
The first paragraph of this article sets the tone for the depth of the evildoers’ lack of self-respect for human life, devoid of personal dignity and betraying the constitutional rights of all American citizens. Let alone the rest of the world as the article details the misuse of power-hungry Mongols.
The authors detailed awakening commenced in 1975. Their research heightened to serious concerns as time advanced due to the blatant disregard for laws all over the world, as well as International governances.
Today we are up against Biological Warfare, covert operations within our government, local municipalities, along with many nations where human rights are violated void of any concern.
The year this was penned 99% were asleep leaving their lives to the 1% of power-hungry globalist.
Chemical and Biological Warfare have been used throughout many wars and of significant value today the awakened say NO MORE, not on my watch, nor in my lifetime.
At the time this was published in 1985 the authors state, “Current genetic developments in what is called, “Recombinant DNA,” threatened to unleash mutant biological warfare strains from which the world may never recover. “ This is most apparent today with the larger than life deformities visible in our global communities in light of the ease in citing’s, with the flick of a finger. The article continues with this statement, “According to recently released Pentagon documents, the Soviets may well have used chemical and biological warfare weapons in Afghanistan.”
The damage to Americans continues today as we have never before been able to stop the evildoers to the extent we are able thanks to Kim and President Trump’s diligence.
As a native New Yorker the temerity to release toxins via the Holland and Lincoln Tunnels along with many turnpikes hints at the covert operations in place while we trusting, God-fearing souls slept. Mind you most Americans are Law-abiding citizens and tax payers. We pledged our Allegiance in school as children. Yet the vastness in crimes against humanity reported herein is the tip of the iceberg.
Between Colorado and Utah, there was an overwhelming outcry against the release of nerve gas bombs in the state of Colorado. Such that our government wanted to remove those bombs to a ‘remote location in Utah,’ all with the belief that they had the authority to ‘neutralize’ those toxic gases in the dessert. Utah basically said, ‘No Can Do.’ Since this article was published the nerve gas is stored near the Stapleton International Airport in Denver. It is fair to assume, “oozing their toxic contents while legislators of Colorado and Utah battle Pentagon bureaucrats over the life-and-death question of what to do with unwanted nerve gas.” However, the Coloradians neglected to protect their own citizens of Denver, let alone world travelers to their region.
We are well versed with respect to the degradation attributed to both biological, as well as, chemical warfare. During the Vietnam War ‘herbicide’ was the term introduced for Agent Orange, the chemical of choice, poisoning countless numbers of GI’s. “Today, those GI’s suffer from the after effects of the weapon, unable to receive adequate compensation from Uncle Sam, who continues to minimize the dangers of Agent Orange.”
Russia also used a nerve gas ‘soman;’ Soman is a clear, colorless, tasteless liquid with a slight odor similar to camphor containing mothballs or rotten fruit. It can become a vapor if heated. It is lethal in all forms. *Mind you all treaties are to be adhered to by all governments that are largely ignored. CIA operatives are equally as guilty. One known agent, John Stockwell, sheds great light on the use of chemical warfare. This practice is still in existence today as we are in ‘A forced stay at Home’ syndrome due to the Corona virus pandemic, which is biological warfare by the elitists OWO (One World Order). Bear in mind, We the People are not sitting quietly while they attempt to reduce those living amongst us, removing our liberties along with blatant disregard for our inalienable rights.
The microwave has been addressed as problematic for a host of health risks since it was established and allowed to enter into private residences for daily use. “In 1962, while sweeping the embassy for bugs, American security personnel detected a microwave beam aimed straight at the embassy. Naturally, the Pentagon and the intelligence community became alarmed at the possibility of neurological and behavioral effects on diplomatic personnel.”
“Microwave authority Dr. Karel Marha of Czechoslovakia declared that microwave bioeffects included pains in the head and eyes, fatigue, and overall weakness, dizziness and vertigo, poor night sleep, irritability, fear, hypochondria, tension, depression, inhibition of intellectual functions and decreased memories.” When faced with modern diseases we recognize the root cause of many current malaises. So much so that U.S. Ambassador Walter J. Stossel, Jr. was quoted in the February 7, 1976 issue of The Los Angeles Times that “microwaves can cause leukemia, skin cancer, cataracts, and various forms of emotional illness.”
Currently, global citizens are in a panic over 5G towers. “5G uses radio waves or radio frequency energy to transmit and receive voice and data connecting our communities…The 5G networks will operate in the millimeter wave spectrum – between 30 GHz and 300 GHz. The advantage of using the millimeter wave spectrum is that it sends larger amounts of data at very high speed and because the frequency is so high, it experiences little interference from most surrounding signals.”* Communities by and large FEAR these towers emit their harmful radio waves into the poorer or financially oppressed areas, where the towers are situated. It is our understanding that a blessed force far greater than any earthly being, has mysteriously protected the world from said harmful rays. Like everything in life, this phrase comes to mind, ‘Time will Tell.’ Yet never try to understand God.
The Russians, by and large, were far more aggressive of nations utilizing various frequencies, which emitted harsh tones that sounded similar to a woodpecker. “On October 14, 1976, the radio communications throughout the globe were disrupted by powerful radio waves emanating from the Soviet Union. The broadcasts appeared irregular and varied between very high and low frequencies.” An alarming scientific find was that weather patterns dramatically shifted trade winds. At the time the shift of natural winds caused a drought in the western United States resulting in diminished agriculture on these farmlands while harming our economy.
At the time, the world was put on notice that these electromagnetic waves may affect our central nervous system, which functions electromagnetically. We now know that the diseases today, and climate changes are directly related to all the technology that is currently operating and so in vogue. A far greater correlation between the OWO agenda’s destruction measure to outdo ‘Mother Nature.’ We are aware that the villains amongst us, the true malefactors on earth, have sold their souls for money and power. Only a contrite heart converted through prayer and supplication can avert their ultimate demise.
Naturally, there are two schools of thought at play here and Nikola Tesla, a pioneer in the field of alternating current and electrical supply systems amongst many others. He was the first human to use wireless power. Sad he was sabotaged early on in his career. A dear friend, Spencer Tandy wrote a musical, Tesla, an Elektrical Spectacle, The Tesla Musical.
There always is a Light at the end of the tunnel, and LIGHT is far more powerful than darkness, scientifically speaking and spiritually awakened concur. We sovereign citizens of America await the timely restoration of our Democratic Republic. Such that our nation will thrive as it was intended with the formal agreement drafted at our Continental Congress on September 7, 1787, namely The Constitution of the United States. President George Washington was inaugurated on April 30, 1789, at Federal Hall in New York City steps from Ground Zero. Getting back to basics rings true to our outcry against the tyranny with which we the global citizens have been subjected to for many millenniums. New York City was chosen by enlightened men for governing our Democratic Republic and the place to TRIUMPH as Sovereign.
All videos, images, and music that do not belong to Speak Project Media, are property of their respected owners.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
© 2020, Speak Project. All rights reserved.
INALIENABLE RIGHTS
Personal rights held by an individual which are not bestowed by law, custom, or belief, and which cannot be taken or given away, or transferred to another person, are referred to as “inalienable rights.” The U.S. Constitution recognized that certain universal rights cannot be taken away by legislation, as they are beyond the control of a government, being naturally given to every individual at birth, and that these rights are retained throughout life. To explore this concept, consider the following inalienable rights definition.
Definition of Inalienable Rights
Noun
1. Rights that are not alienable
2. Rights that are not transferable or capable of being taken away or nullified
Origin
1635-1645 French inalienable
What are Inalienable Rights
The Declaration of Independence gives three examples of inalienable rights, in the well-known phrase, “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.” These fundamental rights are endowed on every human being by his or her Creator, and are often referred to as “natural rights.” Only under carefully limited circumstances can such natural rights be taken away as people have the freedom to exercise them as they choose.
The framers of the Constitution acknowledged the inalienable rights of man in this powerful phrase from the Declaration of Independence:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
The founding fathers intended the government of the new nation to have the sole charge of protecting the inalienable rights of its citizens, and made that clear as they stated:
“That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, – That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government …”
While there is not a specific list of rights that are considered inalienable in the Constitution, there are some rights that are generally accepted as natural rights of man. The list is extensive, and the following are but a few:
• To act in self-defense
• To own private property
• To work and enjoy the fruits of one’s labor
• To move freely within the county or to another country
• To worship or refrain from worshipping within a freely-chosen religion
• To be secure in one’s home
• To think freely
History of Inalienable Rights
The history of inalienable rights, also referred to as “unalienable rights,” takes us back at least as far as the philosophy found in Athens in the 3rd Century B.C. Centuries later, as the Age of Enlightenment rolled through 17th Century Europe, as the common people fought the idea that only those born to the monarchy were endowed with unquestionable rights, the concept of inalienable rights was used to challenge the rights of kings.
As society progressed, natural rights were used to justify the establishment of social contracts, laws that established specific rights for individuals or groups, finally a government to protect legal rights. The concept of inalienable rights had made its mark on the world, though there has been much controversy and differing beliefs on what such rights are. Philosophers and scholars, who held widely differing beliefs, generally agree on the one point that inalienable rights are something that cannot be taken from the people, even at the hands of the government.
For example, John Locke, 17th Century English philosopher, discussed the concept of natural rights as he advanced the idea that life, liberty, and property were fundamental rights that people could not be forced to surrender. It was Thomas Jefferson who later adopted Locke’s belief with the slightly modified statement placed at the beginning of the Declaration of Independence:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
George Mason, delegate to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, in the text of his home state’s Virginia Declaration of Rights, said:
“all men are born equally free,” and hold “certain inherent natural rights, of which they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity.”
Thomas Jefferson relied heavily on the writings of Francis Hutcheson in his Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue, in which he made a distinction between alienable and inalienable rights. Hutcheson stated:
“For wherever any Invasion is made upon unalienable Rights, there must arise either a perfect, or external Right to Resistance … Unalienable Rights are essential Limitations in all Governments.”
And
“[T]here can be no Right, or Limitation of Right, inconsistent with, or opposite to the greatest public Good.”
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
In 1948, the United Nations’ General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The declaration, drafted by a committee directed by former First Lady, Eleanor Roosevelt, proclaims that all humans have certain basic rights as well as inalienable rights. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights created a standard for protecting the rights of all people, regardless of the nation in which they resided. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights also gives the United Nations the authority to take action against abuses of human rights, though the modern process requires a resolution by the Security Council.
Difference Between Inalienable Rights and Legal Rights
American citizens have enjoyed a broad spectrum of rights, the number of rights, privileges, and entitlements having increased over the years since the formation of the United States by the colonists. Not all of the rights enjoyed and expected by Americans are considered to be inalienable rights, which are those rights that simply cannot be taken from any man. They are, instead, rights defined by laws created by government and the people.
The difference between inalienable rights and legal rights is that one is bestowed on every human being by the nature of birth, and the other coded in law. Inalienable rights supersede governmental laws and cultural norms. These natural rights include the right to think for oneself, the right to life, and the right to self-defense, and they remain through every human’s lifetime.
Legal rights, on the other hand, are those created, acknowledged, and protected by a government. In the United States, legal rights include such rights as the right to vote, the right to a fair trial if accused of a crime or civil wrong, and the protection from unfair search and seizure. Legal rights vary depending on the country or state in which each individual resides, as the laws of each jurisdiction outline specific legal rights. Legal rights can be changed, suspended, or revoked as new laws are deemed necessary or more appropriate.
Exceptions to Inalienable Rights
By their very nature, having been bestowed by God, or by happenstance of birth, inalienable rights can only be suspended or abolished in dire circumstance. According to the Constitution of the United States and the legal precedent of the nation, there are certain exceptions to inalienable rights. For instance, a person’s inalienable rights may be temporarily suspended throughout period of due process and trial.
For example:
John has been arrested and charged with felony assault and robbery. His freedom can legally be suspended throughout the investigation and trial preparation, if the judge deems John a danger to society if let out of jail on bail. In the event John is convicted at trial, his right to freedom can be legally taken away for the period he is imprisoned. In addition, some of John’s property, or assets, may be seized to pay restitution to his victim.
A person’s natural rights may also be suspended by an injunction. When issued by a court, an injunction may limit a person’s activities, and is most commonly issued when the exercise of that person’s rights interferes with another person’s rights. In such situations, the court must disentangle the rights of each party during a civil lawsuit. Other situations in which a person’s inalienable rights may be suspended include acts that may interfere with public safety.
Examples of Inalienable Rights
The idea of every person having certain rights that cannot be taken away has existed in the minds of Americans for nearly three centuries. Life has become complex, however, and people are both experiencing a violation of their personal civil rights, and violating the rights of others in new ways. Court records across the country are filled with examples of inalienable rights violations. The following is one example which involves the rights of an unborn child.
State Supreme Court Rules on Inalienable Rights of an Unborn Child
In 2009, Sarah Hicks used cocaine while she was pregnant. Her son tested positive for the drug at the time of his birth, and his mother was charged with the crime of violating Alabama’s chemical endangerment laws. At birth, her son tested positive for cocaine and she was charged with violating Alabama’s chemical-endangerment statue. The statue reads:
” A responsible person commits the crime of chemical endangerment …” if he or she “… knowingly, recklessly, or intentionally causes or permits a child to be exposed to, to ingest or inhale, or to have contact with a controlled substance, chemical substance, or drug paraphernalia …”
In 2010, Hicks pled guilty, but reserved her right to appeal on the issue of whether the statute, which specifies exposing a “child” to such substances, covered a fetus. Hicks was sentenced to three years in prison, though that was suspended, and she was placed on felony probation. Hicks immediately appealed her case to the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals on the grounds that the statute did not specify unborn babies or fetuses, making it an ambiguous law.
The appellate court ruled against Hicks stating that the statue did apply to unborn children or viable fetuses. In 2012, Hicks appealed to the Alabama Supreme Court. Two years later, in the 2014 matter of Sarah Janie Hicks v. the State of Alabama, the state supreme court affirmed the lower court’s decision, confirming that the word “child” in the chemical endangerment statute did pertain to unborn children.
In his written concurring opinion, Chief Justice Roy S. Moore gave one of many notable examples of inalienable rights as he declared:
” … an unborn child has an inalienable right to life from its earliest stages of development,” and added, “I write separately to emphasize that the inalienable right to life is a gift of God that civil government must secure for all persons – born and unborn.”
Related Legal Terms and Issues
• Authority – The right or power to make decisions, to give orders, or to control something or someone.
• Declaration of Independence – The formal statement that declared the freedom of the thirteen American colonies from the rule of Great Britain.
• Due Process – The fundamental, constitutional right to fair legal proceedings in which all parties will be given notice of the proceedings, and have an opportunity to be heard.
• Injunction – A court order preventing an individual or entity from beginning or continuing an action.
• Trial – A formal presentation of evidence before a judge and jury for the purpose of determining guilt or innocence in a criminal case, or to make a determination in a civil matter.
• United Nations – An intergovernmental organization that promotes international peace, cooperation, and security.