Received 10:13 PM EST 1/1/2018
FAITH-FULL CLASS ACTION
Faith is more than a blind trust that waits for change. Faith is why one moves with confidence into areas unknown, towards impossible creations, and the reason why one believes he can take down a giant with a sling shot.
David came down to the front lines and stood in front of the army of Elohim while they stood back terrified of Goliath. David was appalled and said “Who is this Philistine who dares stand in face of the Army of Yahweh?” With no armor, and no advantage other than his faith, that same young man took down the giant with a sling shot and five smooth stones.
That’s where we are today. We know that action by the Treasury is finally at a point where performance is almost guaranteed. As promised we have moved everything into place to support them in their execution of our release.
Please see the terms of the suit listed below.
This is to be attached to the first two pages of a draft of the proposed lawsuit that is essentially ready to be filed in a Federal District Court of New York. Please note, that a similar case will be filed at some point by some attorney, whether TANK files the case or not. The import however will be different which will be explained to follow. This case will be, among other claims, a Class Action, RICO, fraud and Federal statute violation claim. This case could be filed in every district of the United States with a different lead Plaintiff, but instead will be filed in one Federal District and then petitioned to become a nationwide claim litigated in one district.
We believe the Republic –Alliance-White Hats-US Treasury already know that such a case will be filed at some point by an attorney who finds out through a leak, that the redemption of exotic currencies has occurred. Remember that most if not all of the redeemers will have to execute some form of a Non-Disclosure Agreement. Why is that? The essential reason for having an NDA executed regarding these exchanges is to keep the process and details of the redemption transaction QUIET. Why is that important? Pretty obvious: they do not want the general public, who were misled to not get INVOLVED in the largest transfer of wealth in the history of the WORLD, to know that they were misled, lied to, defrauded and downright scammed NOT TO PURCHASE these exotic currencies. And that that misrepresentation lead to damages. All of the agents (banks, other three letter agencies, brokerage firms, etc.) were in on the scam, as the basis for the RICO claim, as they would tell people, for example that the “Iraqi Dinar is a scam.” They put it on public websites, told every customer who inquired about exotic currencies and put out legal notices and warnings regarding this “scam” investment! The hilarious fact about all of this is that the US Treasury required and authorized licenses for currency brokers so that the brokers could then LEGALLY sell these “scam” currencies and bonds, including the IQD, VND and ZIM! The Treasury was making fees providing these licenses to sell the “scam” currencies! Someone was not thinking this through!
GENERAL DISCUSSION OF FIRST LAWSUIT
So, it is believed, and can be assumed, that this first lawsuit will be filed, redemption or not. The difference with having TANK and his legal team filing this case NOW allows the Defendants lead by our US Treasury, to “limit” the liability, legally. TANK will be advising the lawyers and the class members, and driving the litigation, which could perhaps go either “gung-ho” to Jury, or be very tame in the litigation process…tame would be best of course, and could probably 1) limit the opt-in period for class members; 2) limit the description of the class members; 3) limit the damages requested as a simply calculated compensatory kind (not punitive); and 4) limit the amount of attorneys’ fees requested at settlement. Every little bit of limitation of damages helps when you are talking about a lawsuit that could have over 500 million members in the class (50% of US, 25% of Puerto Rico, 25% of Canada, 25% of England, to name few of the possible member pools) and damages per person approaching $100 Trillion dollars (seeing how much the redemption amount actually has been projected for each currency). In other words, having TANK be in control of the largest Class action suit in the History of the World is probably a good idea.
THE PREMISE OF SUIT
Government Agencies, lead by the US. Treasury have portrayed the investment in exotic currencies and bonds such as the Iraqi Dinar, Vietnamese Dong and Zimbabwe Bond as a “scam” or a fraud. To purchase these currencies has been very cheap considering the possible Rate of return, For example, in 2010, one could buy 1 million Iraqi Dinar for $800 USD. We are hearing that the IQD will revaue at over $3.00 per IQD, which means a $800 investment in 2010 would yield $3,000,000 USD. That is quite a profit for a scam investment. And the Treasury was well aware that this was not a scam investment and was in fact a sure thing. The members of that class are potentially every citizen of the United States from 1979 to the present who were of financial investment age. The damages for each would be calculated based upon the aggregate of the lost profit that they would have received from making the investment. And the damages would be determined by a jury. Thus, for example, we know people that 1-100 Trillion Zimbabwe Bond. We put the US Treasury on notice that Zim bond investors believe, based upon US. Treasury and other three letter agency agent “leaks” to currency guru/financial advisors, that the Zim Bond is an active, perpetual, bearer bond which can be redeemed 1-1 in Zimbabwe dollars once Zimbabwe starts using their own currency (Zimbabwe dollars) again in country. And the Zimbabwe dollar is listed at $1USD to 1 ZIM on the US Treasury website, and has been there for many years.
This lawsuit can be filed today, and will not affect the redemptions of currencies that we are waiting for. A lot of “gurus” are saying that filing a lawsuit will tie up the redemtionmoney, which is ridiculous. However, it does have a very POSITIVE affect: the filing of a similar lawsuit filed post-redemption is already expected; thus having TANK as the controller of that suit NOW should be leverage enough to entice the New Powers That Be to trigger the redemption NOW. They are already liable under a second lawsuit that can be filed, on behalf of currency-holders waiting for redemtion: the NPTB have already allowed redemtions for other private citizens and countries, of which we have proof, so there is really no reason not to move forward NOW. We request that TANK gets a call NOW or an escort NOW to effectuate his redemption NOW, and then is given instructions as to how he may release the 1-800 numbers for ZIM redeemers, and other method of release for dinarland , giving all due respect to the process that has been created to maintain order during this release to the general public.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NE YORK
JOHN DOE, )
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, ) JUDGE:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,)
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY,)
UNITED STATES MARINES, ) MAGIS.JUDGE:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE)
OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK DEPT)
OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, )
HONG KONG SHANGHAI BANKING )
CORPORATION, WELLS FARGO )PLAINTIFF DEMANDS TRIAL
BANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ) BY JURY
CITIBANK, N.A., J.P. MORGAN CHASE)
BANK, N.A., GOLDMAN-SACHS BANK, )
NORTHERN TRUST BANK, )
NOW COMES Plaintiff, JOHN DOE, and files this Complaint at Law against the various Defendants, including the DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES MARINES, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, HONG KONG SHANGHAI BANKING CORP.WELL FARGO BANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., CITIBANK, N.A., J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., GOLDMAN-SACHS BANK, NORTHERN TRUST BANK, and brings this action under R.I.C.O., violations of the united States Constitution, common law fraud, statutory fraud, Internet fraud, et al., and shall seek Certification of this lawsuit as a CLASS ACTION under Rules 23(a) and Rule 23(b)(2) and/or 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In support thereof,Plaintiff states as follows:
NATURE OF THE CASE
1. This is an action brought by Plaintiff JOHN DOE, a united States citizen, acting as the primary class member for similarly situated Plaintiffs throughout the united States of America, Puerto Rico, Canada and British Columbia, seeking damages against the Defendants, who are united States government agencies, public servants, corporations, banks and brokers and their agents, who have influence and control over certain investments, and the marketing and distribution thereof, and who have conspired to implement a scheme to defraud Plaintiff JOHN DOE and similarly situated Plaintiffs, of properties, non-speculative investment opportunities and other valuable tangibles, as the victim of the scheme designed recklessly, willfully and wantonly to damage the Plaintiff.
2. As set forth to follow, the conduct of the Defendants their agents, each doing their part in the scheme, the following Counts of this Complaint are plead: Count I – violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §1962; Count II: FRAUD; Count III: NEW YORK General Business Law § 349 Deceptive Trade Practices Act; theUniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (hereinafter “UDTPA”); Count IV: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; COUNT V: Bad Faith Dealings, Race Discrimination; and Count VI:Declaratory Judgment.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3. This Honorable Court has Subject matter jurisdiction conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 1332, because the matter in controversy exceeds the sum of $50,000 and the parties are citizens of different states. The Court also has subject matter jurisdiction over certain claims under 18 U.S.C. § 1964, 7U.S.C. § 25(c), 15 U.S.C. § 77v, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa, 28 U.S.C. § 1331 beccause they arise under the laws of the united States and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as claims arising under the united States Constitution, laws or treaties of the united States of America; and 28 U.S.C. § 1337, as well as 15 U.S.C. §1635. Furthermore, this Honorable Court has supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims under 28 U.S.C. §1367.
4. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391, 15 U.S.C. § 77v, 15 U.S.C. § 77aa, 18 U.S.C. § 1965 and 7 U.S.C § 25(c).